Main
Video Reverse Search
T-Bit Project
About TAPe
API
Team
Contacts
Demo
Ru
Main
Video Reverse Search
T-Bit Project
About TAPe
API
Team
Contacts
Demo
Ru
The almanac about new method of information processing
What's actually wrong with the concept of AI
Biology and artificial intelligence
Cognitive science: a beginning without an end
Holism and brain studies
Theory of Active Perception
Why perception is necessary for modeling human-like thinking
What's actually wrong with the concept of AI
Evolution of ideas underlying AI: Brief Description
Biology does not understand how the brain works
Why AI does need biology after all
How far artificial neurons are from the real ones
Creating something really similar to how the brain works
Cognitive science: a beginning without an end
Cognitive science has never produced anything practical
Consciousness is not amenable to science
No one knows what consciousness is, everyone keeps talking about it
A sudden idea — the quantum nature of consciousness
Orchestrated objective reduction: what it is and what for
Another theory of consciousness: the integrated information theory
Global workspace theory
Conscious and unconscious thinking. Questions to an academic
Questions for Theories of Consciousness
Ultimate ways to study consciousness without cutting into the brain
Albert Einstein suspected something
Why has psychoanalysis progressed more than science without scientific methods
Insights from intuition and deep observation are not exhausted and are as good as AI
There is no computation in the brain as we all know it. What kind is there?
Why it’s unreasonable to use word Learning in relation to AI
There is a different calculability: what Hilbert and Gödel discovered
Why the brain should be studied as a whole
TAPe models the workings of the mechanisms of perception
Language is a complete system, it’s how it should be studied
The principles by which the Language of Thought functions
The isomorphism of Chinese characters and TAPe
T-Bit: a unit of information 1000x of times more efficient
Questions for Theories of Consciousness
There are almost three dozen theories of consciousness—or maybe more. There is no point in listing them out, but there is a point in asking questions—which those theories don’t answer for various reasons.
01
02
Did consciousness arise from specific computations, or does consciousness make those very computations in the course of, let’s say, vital activity? And if it does make those specific computations, are they somehow different from the specific computations made by thinking?
Finally, what is the place occupied by thinking? And where is it? If consciousness is non-computable, then can thinking be computable as a process? Can it therefore be represented in the form of binary code or AI models (architectures, approaches)? Hardly. May it be so that specific computations are what thinking is?
04
03
If consciousness can be reproduced in computing machines, albeit with a specific architecture, then probably thinking must also be reproduced in computing machines with a specific architecture. Or have we suddenly left it behind?
05
But in reality, something else matters here: true, thinking is not algorithmic or even — in the current understanding of the laws of algorithms, logic, mathematics, linguistics, and so on — non-computable, though it most likely has a different computability that surely cannot be described by binary code and weights.
06
More importantly, thinking is a process made up of specific computations and somehow involved in the "production" of consciousness.
Separating consciousness and thinking is inefficient to say the least, they rather represent something unitary and indivisible (a whole). It is difficult to talk about consciousness and leave thinking out.